Saturday, May 31st, 2008

Canada’s carriers undermine Canadian innovation

in: Startups

The Ottawa Net Neutrality rally last week was a decent effort, but Canadian consumers need to get fired up about their information infrastructure for it to catch on as an issue politicians care about. Canada’s telco monopolies — each of which is part of a major media conglomerate — have no reason to play fair on this. Bell’s land lines are dwindling (down 9.9%) according to its 2007 annual report; and revenues from long distance (down 8.1 percent) are vanishing to VOIP.

But the problem is that telco stuff like net neutrality isn’t sexy, as extralife brilliantly points out. Class action lawsuits might make people care — particularly if there’s a $2,000 windfall at the end of them.

Read more…

Monday, May 26th, 2008

Plan B: Five reasons companies merge and acquire

in: Competition, Create, Exit strategy

Every startup dreams of making it big. And some do; but it’s vastly more likely that you’ll get acquired by a bigger fish.

This is one of the reasons VCs look so hard for exit strategies involving other people in your market. It’s a more likely outcome, and it means that if when things go wrong, you have a Plan B. It’s important to understand why companies want to merge and acquire within their space.

When acquisitions happen, particularly by public suitors, the business must be accretive to revenues in the first year, and must not impact margins. This is because the public company’s investor’s will scrutinize revenues and margins, and will expect to see an uptick. So the obvious motivations for acquisition are for getting new stuff to sell to existing customers, or for getting new customers.

When a market consolidates — meaning firms of roughly equal size acquire one another, or the bigger players roll up the smaller ones, different criteria dominate. This tends to happen in “nuclear winters” like the funding shortage many think is upon us.

4quad.gif

Strategic Marketing 101 talks about four kinds of products: Stars, Dogs, Cash Cows, and Question Marks. The classification comes from two dimensions: Whether the product line is profitable (showing things like decent revenues and good margins) and whether it’s growing (showing an increased number of users and buyers, with hopefully an accelerating rate of adoption.)

Everyone wants a star, and that’s what startups are after. Most startups are question marks: No customers, no revenues, and high hopes. If they can get both growth (customers) and profitability (revenues), things are good. But if they manage profits without accelerating growth, it’s a clear sign that mergers are in the cards.

Here are five other motivations behind M&A in consolidating markets. Read more…

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

If you’re not at Mesh08

in: Communicate

scriblive.gifScribblelive really is the next best thing. Check out this play-by-play of Michael Geist’s presentation yesterday, complete with every clip and video mentioned.

It should be said, however, that the live blog is only as good as its contributors. If too many people get involved in one event, it can be chaotic; in this case, there were a few dedicated folks snapping pictures and pasting links from the front row.

Personally, I find this much more useful than a video capture. It’s random-access, and it’s got embedded links to all the content.

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

Air Canada gets it wrong

in: Communicate, Create, Standing out

I have a love-hate relationship with Air Canada.

I fly their planes a lot, since I’m usually starting from Montreal or Halifax. I love the fact that frequent travelers get access to their lounge without an extra fee, even when it’s a partner’s lounge.

03212008001.jpgBut frustrated by ridiculously broken enrollment and online booking processes (things like having to convince their call centers that yes, in fact, the screen in front of me does say “server error.”) I switched my loyalties to United, who get it right much more often.

On the other hand, Air Canada has great planes, with power and screens. I was starting to warm to them again; they’ve overhauled their entire website. It still has problems, such as the complete failure of their mobile booking process (apparently intended to send a barcode to my phone.) But it’s getting better.

And then they go and break my heart again.

Read more…

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

DNS parking 2.0: 10 other places you should register your name

in: Communicate, Standing out, Startups

It’s not enough to register your .com, .org, and .net any more.  Here are some places we’ve been camping out recently, reserving names and keywords before someone else does.

Unlike the domain name world, where ICANN can regulate egregious violations of copyright, it’s unclear how naming disputes will be resolved by many of these sites. So it’s the first-come-first-served Wild West of the nineties

  • Twitter: RSS for people. If you don’t own the Twitter ID, someone else will.
  • Drop.io: A place for your stuff, with your name. URLs use the format drop.io/myname.
  • Facebook: Groups in Facebook have names, and you should own yours.
  • Myspace: Despite Facebook’s buzz, Myspace still has lots of users. Get a page.
  • Paypal: If you’re taking payments, then people will be more comfortable if they’re paying someone with the same name.
  • Eventbrite: Running an event? You should probably use the name of your event before it’s taken.
  • Pownce: The other Twitter.
  • Digg and Reddit: If you’re going to comment on things and be a part of the community, go grab those.
  • Slideshare: If you’re going to post presentations using this service, you may want the name to go with them.

I’m off to register some names.

Monday, May 19th, 2008

Getting people’s attention

in: Communicate, Standing out

About a month ago, I wrote a piece on ways the Internet could die. It was an interesting experience: The story got Dugg, comments went through the roof, and lots of people decided to comment on it. At the same time, news sites picked it up, “summarized” it, and posted it. This in turn led to a new wave of traffic on those sites (and some slightly more thoughtful discussion than the initial Digg invective.)

The lessons from all this:

  • Bumper sticker headlines work
  • People click on Top Ten lists because they love order and structure
  • People complain about Top Ten lists because they’re often linkbait for Reddit
  • If you can work in enough topics, everyone will have an opinion

For a site like GigaOm, which is well respected, you can do this stuff from time to time. But you have to back it up with real content; in my (unscientific) experience, others are more likely to steal or linkjack a top ten list, and visitors are less likely to subscribe to the post.

And last of all, whatever your idea, Trey Parker and Matt Stone have done it already, only better.

Thanks to John Overton for that one.

Next Page »